Data model
Metalang99 provides four different types of collections, as well as a means for defining and dealing with compound data types. (Type checking is not performed due to performance reasons.)
Variadics
Representation: x, y, z, ....
Documentation: variadics.h.
Variadics are a comma-separated list of preprocessor tokens. Most of the time, a user will provide variadic arguments to your macro so that you could manipulate them as you want:
#include <metalang99.h>
#include <assert.h>
#define ASSERT_FOR_EACH(...) \
do { \
ML99_EVAL(ML99_variadicsForEach( \
ML99_compose(v(ML99_semicoloned), ML99_reify(v(assert))), \
v(__VA_ARGS__))) \
} while (0)
int main(void) {
ASSERT_FOR_EACH(123 == 123, 2 + 2 == 4, "foo"[1] == 'o');
}Here, ASSERT_FOR_EACH accepts variadic arguments, which is communicated by its signature. Internally, it calls ML99_variadicsForEach to iterate through each argument, resulting in a number of assert(...); statements instead of one assert(a && b && ...); (which makes debugging easier because failed assertions will not be collapsed with each other).
Tuple
Representation: (x, y, z, ...).
Documentation: tuple.h.
A tuple is formed by putting variadic arguments into parentheses. Besides a collection-like usage, tuples can simulate C structures; the common pattern is to define a tuple constructor (rect below) and accessors of the corresponding fields (rectWidth and rectHeight):
In type theory, tuples are known as product types.
Choice
Representation: (tag, ...).
Documentation: choice.h.
A choice type encodes a set of alternatives; each alternative can be constructed by a corresponding value constructor and be inspected by the means of pattern matching:
In type theory, choice types are usually referred to as sum types.
Cons-list
Representation: choice type.
Documentation: list.h.
A cons-list is represented as a choice type with two alternatives: an empty list ML99_nil() and a list constructor ML99_cons(x, xs). Cons-list is the most powerful collection:
Although cons-lists provide many more functions than any other collection, they are also more time and space-consuming. If you can deal with a native representation directly (such as variadics, tuples, or sequences), you should do so. Most of the time, a user will provide variadic arguments to your macro, and the only appropriate operation will be for-each loop (such as ML99_variadicsForEach).
However, if you still miss a certain function for native collections, you can always convert your representation to a cons-list via ML99_list, ML99_listFromSeq, etc.
Sequence
Representation: (x)(y)(z) ....
Documentation: seq.h.
A sequence is yet another fast native collection. A perfect example of using sequences is Interface99, which allows us to define a software interface like this:
With vfunc being defined as follows (simplified):
Thus, a number of vfunc invocations forms a complete sequence. Later, Interface99 works with this sequence via ML99_seqForEach and a few other helpful macros.
Last updated
Was this helpful?